Good Strategy / Bad Strategy: The
Difference and Why It Matters - Richard Rumelt
My take home points from the book. Recommended
reading for marketers in large corporations – good chance you will recognise
many standard procedures in the “bad strategy” sections . . .
- The
core of strategy is about focus and the application of strength against
weakness or the most promising opportunity;
- A
good strategy has an essential logical structure that contains three elements: a diagnosis, a guiding policy, and coherent
action;
- First
work to discover the very most promising opportunities for the business;
- The
cleverest strategies begin with strategic resources that competitors cannot
duplicate without suffering a net economic loss.
- Look
at the special skills and resources that underlie a competitive advantage
(momentarily look away from products, buyers, and competitors)
- Achieve
leverage by identifying a pivot point that will magnify the effects of focused
energy and resources.
- To
obtain higher performance, leaders must identify the critical obstacles to
forward progress;
- Look
very closely at what is changing in your business, where you might get a jump
on the competition;
- A
good strategy doesn’t just draw on existing strength; it creates strength
through the coherence of its design;
- Advantage
is rooted in differences. By providing
more value you avoid being a commodity.
- Create-destroy
discipline. The creation of new higher
quality alternatives requires that one tries hard to “destroy” any existing
alternatives, exposing their fault lines and internal contradictions.
- The
most powerful strategies arise from game-changing insights;
- Pre-commit
to a position and then evaluate your own judgment to increase the chance of learning
something.
- Take
on the viewpoints of others. See how the
situation looks to a rival or to a customer, anticipate others’ behaviour.
- Engineering
higher demand for the services of scarce resources is the most basic of
business stratagems.
- Follow
Michael Porter’s “Five Forces” analysis in preference to SWOT analysis.
- Leaders
must acquire enough expertise to question the experts.
- You
should have a very short list of the most important things for the company to
do.
- A
strategy that fails to define a variety of plausible and feasible immediate
actions is missing a critical component;
- Make
objectives more like tasks and less like goals.
- Look
five to ten years ahead.
- Avoid
strategy plans by template filling
If
you liked this post, please share it.
